Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17KK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Alpha 17 C7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-17KK  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 15 '24 at 16:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 210
2-Core 413
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,584
142% 1,200 Pts
64-Core 3,433
212% 3,433 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 157
Parallax 143
145% 159 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 120
Splatting 97.3
114% 146 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2695 2645 2595 1508 1541 1541 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,611
Write 2,884
Mixed 2,762
SusWrite 2,087
584% 2,586 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 68.8
231% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,696
DQ Write 1,337
DQ Mixed 1,509
1,131% 1,514 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 371%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 26.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 17.2" 1280 720 CSO1702 MNH301CA3-1
Typical MS-17KK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17KK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback