Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive424% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '24 at 04:11
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 232
2-Core 450
131% 255 Pts
4-Core 848
8-Core 1,593
146% 1,220 Pts
64-Core 3,266
202% 3,266 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 300A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 12.1
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 13
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3244 3223 3299 2051 1497 1492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2,609
Write 2676
Mixed 2,636
SusWrite 2,468
586% 2,597 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 93.8
326% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,772
DQ Write 1293
DQ Mixed 1,510
1,135% 1,525 MB/s
Poor: 338%
This bench: 424%
Great: 424%
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3205 3311 3314 2362 1538 1505 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 2,612
Write 2,721
Mixed 2,608
SusWrite 2539
592% 2,620 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 94.3
330% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,833
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,605
1,202% 1,610 MB/s
Poor: 338%
This bench: 433%
Great: 424%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC56BD1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 74.2
MC Write 68.8
MC Mixed 67.4
200% 70.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 34.5
101% 35.4 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 179%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 120 16" 1280 720 AUO8EA6
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback