Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime8 Days
Run DateSep 25 '24 at 07:30
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 66.4
1-Core 211
2-Core 374
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 921
97% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,567
97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 300D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9.4
7% 10 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 15
Splatting 0.3
6% 8.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3335 1260 1869 2582 1556 2378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 827
Mixed 348
SusWrite 2,163
327% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.7
224% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 1,087
709% 861 MB/s
Poor: 338%
This bench: 338%
Great: 424%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 49.3
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 240 0" 2048 1081 SDC41AB
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback