Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory	56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 05:33
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 157 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 543 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 1533 95% 1533 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.4% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 60.3 Parallax 55.8 47% 58 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 55.1 Splatting 50 45% 56 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUGA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18097 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 376 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 192 192 2233403321781 (AE) Unknown 200 200 1181116 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 157 (C2) HDA temperature 70 59 176094511134 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 418121 (F2) Unknown 100 100 278623 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	83.1% Excellent	Read 494 Write 470 Mixed 480 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 25.3 79% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 98.7 107% 180 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 132 132 17198416164 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3343 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17068 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 342 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3441 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3441 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 214749216800 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.3% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 158 Mixed 147 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.2 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 502GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 238650664 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5773 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 109829043 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 930 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 51 505217054 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 368 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 14 14 172165 (C2) HDA temperature 30 49 47244640286 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 28260884821977 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -132084318613036 (F2) Unknown 100 253 105799581680418	88.8% Excellent	Read 130 Write 180 Mixed 160 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.31 101% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 112%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 722GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 33.1 Mixed 20 37% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.27 25% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 43%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 456GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 39.8 Write 40.8 Mixed 14.8 38% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB 1,230 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.2% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 117%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v41stBench 71%, 283 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GBSamsungBench 115%, 2,359 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 8x31.9GBHynixBench 117%, 105 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	5x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16