Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 01:54
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 101
49% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 261
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 13
Parallax 15.3
14% 15 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 13.3
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 394
Write 30.4
Mixed 277
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 1.16
46% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
15% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
306GB free
Firmware: MS1OA650 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 95
Write 90.4
Mixed 92.7
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 103
154% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.24
88% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
791GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 24.6
Mixed 12.3
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.31
50% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL KHX1600C9D3/8GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 11.1
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback