Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3162-A1
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 21:28
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 191 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 353 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 109 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 8099) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 1.91 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 29674336 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 71236327571481 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 15 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 32 73016541214 (C2) HDA temperature 30 32 73016541214 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 29674336 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 29674336 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 29674336 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294963484 (EA) Unknown 0 0 65 (F1) Unknown 0 0 65 (F2) Unknown 0 0 86 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1376272	61.8% Good	Read 502 Write 211 Mixed 288 73% 333 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 14.3 76% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 58.4 68% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 435GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 197 0 (03) Spinup time 171 171 6408 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 220 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 380 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 185 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 220 (C2) HDA temperature 102 91 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.8% Average	Read 74.3 Write 74.3 Mixed 73.1 56% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.49 119% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-006.A01LF 4x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E910 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	96x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	17x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	61x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	16x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 656 samples	4x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 20GBUnknownBench 54%, 9 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16