HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121205
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 11:32
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 98 2-Core 197 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 489 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 307.83 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 15 11% 14 fps	MRender 17.2 Gravity 17.9 Splatting 16.7 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6185 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1730 (B1) Unknown 95 95 59 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 147 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23631677944	53.3% Above average	Read 450 Write 115 Mixed 138 51% 234 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 9.73 66% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 31.1 70% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 256GB-$35 2,939 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 0GB free Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1337 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 323 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 446 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196618 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C2) HDA temperature 63 53 201864380453 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 951 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 866 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1017 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3 (F5) Unknown 100 100 10 (F6) Unknown 100 100 249984	70.3% Very good	Read 515 Write 415 Mixed 422 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 7.7 39% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 11.9 84% 197 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 4x4GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	295x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16