HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8015
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 02:43
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.1% Poor
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 79.2
29% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 149
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 144
10% 144 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8015) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 11.6
2% 11.3 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 8.9
2% 7.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 96.6
Mixed 90.4
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.17
63% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 11,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback