Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170608
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '18 at 21:21
Run Duration	675 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 251 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 652 72% 570 Pts	64-Core 699 43% 699 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.7% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 104 Parallax 88 75% 94.6 fps	MRender 92.3 Gravity 86.8 Splatting 92.1 74% 90.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 175 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 270 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 20 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 54 197569544227 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9482340593 (F7) Unknown 100 100 297322290 (F8) Unknown 100 100 194188853 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2056 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	77.9% Very good	Read 469 Write 458 Mixed 477 105% 468 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 15.6 84% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 17.1 50% 100 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169896 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 827 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 271 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1408 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1408 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 163209936932 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 176 Mixed 170 132% 175 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.2 103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 26GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 120 Write 14.7 Mixed 15.1 42% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.008 38% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 22%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.3% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 2.43 Mixed 6.9 8% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.56 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 1.28 121% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.3% Great: 13%
HP v210w 8GB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 5607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 4.11 Mixed 4.04 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.39 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.004 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB 940 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 25.9 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 25.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	905x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	724x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	450x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	296x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	235x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	145x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	170x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16