Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '18 at 01:58
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 287 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 916 89% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,146 71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23 Parallax 18.7 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 356GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3731 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 626 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C2) HDA temperature 77 53 201864380439	70.7% Very good	Read 498 Write 272 Mixed 270 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 7.79 82% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 35.8 85% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 99%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1527 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 71 (C2) HDA temperature 77 49 219044380695 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	107% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 465 Mixed 478 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 43.6 144% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 198 172% 258 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 52GB free Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4759 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 840 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12896043136 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 16 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 28 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 77 49 210454446103 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 257703280720 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1920 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2343 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1786 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7145 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	74.2% Very good	Read 488 Write 196 Mixed 213 65% 299 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 18.9 105% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 48.1 95% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 108%
Samsung HD103UJ 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 35661512 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5769 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 34643057089 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25666 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1795 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 106 (BE) vendor-specific 77 54 77696532503 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 396 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 35 35 130173 (C2) HDA temperature 23 46 -140737488355305 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 104238856289477 (F1) Unknown 100 253 311973742050 (F2) Unknown 100 253 353624610746	69.5% Good	Read 114 Write 128 Mixed 123 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.17 56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 76 64 39246473 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 536 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5190067 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 110930415321572 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 77 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 52 403963928 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1173 (C2) HDA temperature 24 48 85899345944 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 76 64 39246473 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 4771708666028 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5164434561 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2255669464	63.9% Good	Read 129 Write 91.6 Mixed 49.4 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 5.33 4K Mixed 0.49 323% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 90%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 1,355 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 66.9 112% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.2 62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 23.4 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 23.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,761x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,043x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	478x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,355x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	809x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	346x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	282x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	405x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	330x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	264x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16