Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 17:34
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$240
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.4% Very good
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
78% 165 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 665
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 878
59% 878 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75% Very good
Lighting 300
Reflection 277
Parallax 306
79% 294 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 279
Splatting 188
75% 215 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 402
Mixed 414
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 41
155% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 38.9
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 112
99% 140 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
141GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 65.1
Write 86.3
Mixed 104
65% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.08
30% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 71%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
121GB free
Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 50.1
Mixed 59.3
42% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.26
62% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 45%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
78GB free
Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 50
Mixed 53.6
36% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$29
54GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 114
Write 100
Mixed 82.2
74% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.46
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$29
47GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 84.3
Mixed 77.1
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.21
69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$35
40GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 94
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.21
68% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
67% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 101%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 3,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback