Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 00:06
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 156
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 480
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Sapphire(174B 4255) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 38
Parallax 54
35% 45 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 35.6
37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asrock RAM Disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$66
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 132
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.13
70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM 4GX3M1A1333C C 4GX3M1A1333C CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 MV4GX3M1A1333C 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback