Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP700Z5C-S02UB
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131104
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 23:06
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	43%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3635QM 2,986 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 8.8 2-Core 18.9 27% 32 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 61.2 5% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 81.1 5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 2.56 3% 3.3 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 5.17 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2900 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1319 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 10 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10845038419	51.9% Above average	Read 482 Write 334 Mixed 353 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 7.5 39% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 6.93 8% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB 740 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 15.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

CPU
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	69x
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	67x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	128x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	24x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	7x

SSD
i100 8GBSandiskBench 15%, 268 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 740 samples	54x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 289 samples	17x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16