Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Memory 25.8 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 35.3 17% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 57.7 8-Core 55.4 8% 56.6 Pts	64-Core 65.6 4% 65.6 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.94 2% 1.14 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.17 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4128 125GB 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25% Poor	Read 268 Write 108 Mixed 154 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 8.84 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 3.9 24% 8.11 MB/s	DQ Read 10.2 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 3.67 5% 9.74 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 280 14% 280 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	7x

SSD
TS512GMTS430S 512GBTranscendBench 85%, 550 samples	4x
NT-128 128GBBench 60%, 1,116 samples	1x
TS240GMTS420S 240GBTranscendBench 64%, 851 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	6x
123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GBABCDBench 24%, 198 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16