Koloe X58

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 0.000976563 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '18 at 19:38
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5530 662 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 116 55% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 286 30% 242 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 13 14% 14.8 fps	MRender 22.6 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 16 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed T6-120G PLUS 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 115GB free Firmware: 02000004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 459 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (A1) Unknown 100 100 182 (A3) Unknown 100 100 66 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 40 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 62 (F2) Unknown 100 100 45	43.9% Average	Read 216 Write 221 Mixed 194 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 8.68 69% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 58.2 DQ Mixed 9.06 17% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 137 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 345 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 144 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 314 (C2) HDA temperature 95 86 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	56.2% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 99.4 Mixed 30.3 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.31 87% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MXIC 25L8005 1x33GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 7 slots used 33GB FLASH 33 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	87x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	78x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16