Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 46.3 23% 35.8 Pts	4-Core 53.6 8-Core 79.5 8% 66.6 Pts	64-Core 84.2 5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 2.25 1% 2.51 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 288 263 267 283 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 303 Write 264 Mixed 250 SusWrite 272 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 29.5 78% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 116 96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KP223C-ELD 2x2GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	1x

SSD
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x

RAM
PSD34G160081 1x4GBPatriotBench 26%, 818 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $36

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16