Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H-BK
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 22:33
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 245
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 540
60% 472 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 52.8
34% 44.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 35.9
36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 306 305 308 323 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 355
Mixed 339
SusWrite 316
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 45.9
182% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 223
203% 310 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
291GB free
Firmware: 40.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 117 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 117
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 19.2
32% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
6TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 31.5
Write 27
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 28
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1
185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 98%
JMicron Generic DISK00 6TB
745GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 28
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 19
33% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback