PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110623 |
Uptime | 7.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 31 '18 at 15:51 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | MDA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 6326) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.48%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$38
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 17 15 19 47 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Asmt 2115 320GB
194GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 25 29 29 30 30 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 96x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 81x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 205x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 36x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 27x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 12x |
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples | 6x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |