Average Bench: 72.9% (75th of 115)

Based on 680 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB

Good average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB averaged 27.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 30.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB is 50.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.8GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 88.4ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 680 samples)
Min Avg Max
20 MC Read 27.1 44.8
22.6 MC Write 30.3 55.1
19 MC Mixed 22.4 25.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.55 SC Read 13.8 17
16.3 SC Write 26.1 35.3
12.8 SC Mixed 19.7 23.8
56.8% 19.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
71.3 Latency 88.4 119
45.2% 88.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 22
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 22.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 22.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 21.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 24.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
680 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,114,636 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback