PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z210 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1587h |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110811 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 30 '18 at 04:08 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 140 155 152 157 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
72GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 94 95 97 98 MB/s
|
60%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 160GB
40GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 9.6 11 8.2 MB/s
|
9.56%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 341x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 122x |
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 115x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 107x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 83x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $215 |