Asus M32CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150828
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '18 at 08:58
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 390 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.5 16% 17.9 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 20.4 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 60GB 2,308 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 396 Write 97.5 Mixed 121 44% 205 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 8.7 85% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 70.8 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 8.9 24% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 661GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 190 Write 152 Mixed 35.6 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB 5,337 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 860GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 4,359 Write 15.2 Mixed 30.6 980% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 604 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.5 2,371% 203 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 45%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 22.2 Write 7.7 Mixed 8.5 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	187x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	86x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	51x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	64x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	22x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 63 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16