PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130809 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 05:18 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patriot Burst 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 245 251 255 260 294 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
517GB free
Firmware: 1K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 146 147 148 150 MB/s
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron-002C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 98x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 62x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 52x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |