MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 20:48
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 93.4
46% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 132
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 21.1
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.3
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACJC2M064S25 60GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.095.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 45 55 56 48 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
Read 176
Write 85.8
Mixed 111
SusWrite 41.9
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 3.4
33% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 6
14% 28.5 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
82GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 91 81 94 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 82.2
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLGE85F-C8KL9A 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback