Biostar TZ68K+

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TZ68K+ (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '18 at 21:59
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 98.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 218 85% 146 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 476 64% 480 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PowerColor(148C 2359) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.11.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 47.2 Reflection 51.7 Parallax 56.2 38% 51.7 fps	MRender 52.2 Gravity 41 Splatting 37.1 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,006 Write 6,254 Mixed 6,230 1,449% 6,497 MB/s	4K Read 431 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 245 1,069% 290 MB/s	DQ Read 1,611 DQ Write 1,118 DQ Mixed 1,308 992% 1,346 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 157GB free Firmware: HTRAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 427 427 427 427 427 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 442 Write 431 Mixed 412 SusWrite 427 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 29.2 96% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 243 174% 228 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 106%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 8,981 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 781GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 244 244 246 246 246 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 247 Write 231 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 244 140% 194 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 184%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GXH F3-2133C9-8GXH 16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 25.6 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 45.7 88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TZ68K+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TZ68K+

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	8x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	6x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	2x
SL300 120GBColorfulBench 61%, 1,356 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GBHynixBench 54%, 19 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 517 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16