MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7522
Motherboard	MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110319
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 15:27
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 135 66% 104 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 469 44% 366 Pts	64-Core 588 36% 588 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.9% Above average	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 63.2 57% 69 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 68 Splatting 69 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 184 208 122 67 64 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.8% Good	Read 258 Write 164 Mixed 226 SusWrite 136 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 37.8 123% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 89.8 DQ Mixed 125 99% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 20GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 107 50 43 47 50 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68% Good	Read 261 Write 247 Mixed 215 SusWrite 78.3 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 41.9 141% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 151 126% 183 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 259GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 67 67 66 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 104 Write 97.3 Mixed 90 SusWrite 66.4 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 140GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 74 75 74 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 79.8 Write 76 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 74.3 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 60%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 407GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 83 84 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 61.8 Write 66 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 82.2 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 62%
Inateck FE2005 500GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 164GB free, PID 2590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 28.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 21.2 36% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 176%
Inateck FE2005 500GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 380GB free, PID 2590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 33 Write 27.3 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 21.3 34% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 176%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	188x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	124x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	65x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	116x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	75x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16