Asrock H270 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170111
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '19 at 22:43
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 162 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 396 47% 364 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6171) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.1% Good	Lighting 83.5 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 85.2 68% 74.6 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 85.5 56% 66.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 16 5.8 1.4 14 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 327 Write 45 Mixed 96 SusWrite 31.4 27% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 15 39% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 2 64% 150 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 86%
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 234GB free Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 343 133 97 94 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 419 Write 344 Mixed 330 SusWrite 184 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 25.7 110% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 198 180% 274 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $295

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	103x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	94x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16