PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110804 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 12 '19 at 02:55 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.11
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 84 114 39 16 61 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
529GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 140 141 142 144 145 MB/s
|
83.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Generic External 500GB
466GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 28 29 29 28 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
Imation Apollo M100 USB3 1TB
89GB free, PID 1905
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 54x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 27x |
Pentium G620Intel $30Bench 46%, 12,899 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 35x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |