Asus X550VC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus X550VC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550VC
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 88 2-Core 127 63% 100 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 124D) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.15 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.74 4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 137 72 90 68 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 480 Write 420 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 140 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 0.6 48% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 0.4 54% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 13GB free, PID 2321 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 40 Write 37.1 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 37.6 49% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 43%
JMicron Generic 500GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 31GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 72 82 77 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 63.6 Write 64.7 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 72.6 76% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 222%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 859B CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VC

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	173x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	17x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	152x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	44x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 203 samples	20x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBMicronBench 41%, 542 samples	18x
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16