Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '16 at 04:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 180
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 786
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 985
61% 985 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 101
87% 107 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 82
75% 92.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
398GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 485
Mixed 511
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 36.6
125% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 132
135% 216 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
179GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 404
Mixed 415
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 34.3
125% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 106
121% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 762
Mixed 1,027
239% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 24
114% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 22.8
51% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 145%
Great: 243%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
3TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
3TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 39.1
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback