Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 21:56
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Memory 17.9
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 51.4
18% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 102
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 99.7
6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Lighting 28.2
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 42.2
23% 32.3 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 35.3
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 68 99 138 148 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 188
Write 11
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 115
20% 93 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 12.4
31% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 156
109% 137 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
736GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 77 96 102 97 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 87.7
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 95.2
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
14GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 73 91 99 90 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 34.2
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 90.6
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
237GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 55 64 67 61 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 53
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 64.3
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
121% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 65%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 94 134 155 158 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 130
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 140
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
526% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 110%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 129GB
24GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 23 24 26 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 7.4
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 23.5
22% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.9
189% 2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback