Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 741 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 136 48% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 430 42% 345 Pts	64-Core 1,549 96% 1,549 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 882 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 34 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 44 (A3) Unknown 100 100 630 (94) Unknown 100 100 212030 (95) Unknown 100 100 3097 (96) Unknown 100 100 2921 (97) Unknown 100 100 3073 (A4) Unknown 100 100 52449 (A5) Unknown 100 100 85 (A6) Unknown 100 100 11 (A7) Unknown 100 100 41 (A9) Unknown 100 100 96 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 41923782049820 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 796375 (F2) Unknown 100 100 224974 (F5) Unknown 100 100 619553 (F6) Unknown 100 100 848120 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	49.5% Average	Read 478 Write 48.1 Mixed 246 56% 257 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 18.9 72% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 82.8 DQ Mixed 46.8 54% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C 8x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 8 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 17 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16