HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 37 2-Core 72.2 40% 59.5 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 70.6 10% 71.6 Pts	64-Core 71.3 4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 38.2 32% 36.1 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 37.1 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 169 163 159 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 177 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 164 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 52GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	53x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	90x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	20x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:01 98 K1N7HK-HYC 48GBUnknownBench 19%, 8 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 38GBUnknownBench 20%, 147 samples	5x
ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GBUnknownBench 19%, 31 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16