Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 02:30
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3350P CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 174
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 333
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 9.75
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 12
Splatting 15.5
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 520ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 508
Write 263
Mixed 294
78% 355 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 17.4
88% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 65.1
103% 196 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
351GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
317GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 150
Mixed 126
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.66
146% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 174%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 2TB
286GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 26.2
Mixed 29
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.36
59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback