Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 349 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0492) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.18 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 45 49 50 50 47 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.7% Below average	Read 191 Write 94.6 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 72.4 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 15.1 57% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 56.7 DQ Write 79.9 DQ Mixed 86.4 60% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G ACR256X64D3U13C9G 6GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 13.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	60x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	18x
GeForce 510NvidiaBench 1%, 347 samples	18x

RAM
HU524303EP0200 2x2GBUnifosaBench 33%, 393 samples	13x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	10x
HU564403EP0200 2x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 909 samples	8x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $250

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16