Intel S5520UR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S5520UR  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 18:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 120
47% 80 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 334
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MegaSR 499GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.1 8.8 9.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 114
Write 95.8
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 9.2
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 76%
Intel MegaSR 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.7 8.6 8.7 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 8.4
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5520UR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5520UR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback