Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 141 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 253 35% 259 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04CA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.34 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120G 120GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q011 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 154 153 154 154 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 305 Write 145 Mixed 137 SusWrite 152 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 8.9 60% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 85.2 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 56.3 61% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 6GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,263x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	378x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	296x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	88x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	68x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	50x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16