Toshiba SATELLITE L850-16D

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 52% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-16D (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '16 at 15:15
Run Duration	102 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	44%
CPU Throttled	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 53 35% 50 Pts	4-Core 95 8-Core 134 14% 114 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 3.41 3% 3.72 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 3.07 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 80 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 252 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 31 (A3) Unknown 100 100 276 (94) Unknown 100 100 19594 (95) Unknown 100 100 283 (96) Unknown 100 100 176 (97) Unknown 100 100 264 (A4) Unknown 100 100 3692 (A5) Unknown 100 100 28 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40832877002779 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 20834 (F2) Unknown 100 100 22274 (F5) Unknown 100 100 21805 (F6) Unknown 100 100 39188 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	39.2% Below average	Read 320 Write 182 Mixed 160 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 8.78 47% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 36.4 DQ Mixed 10.6 14% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16