Biostar A70MGP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A70MGP  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 03:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 131
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 207
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 69
Parallax 88.9
61% 77.6 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 58.7
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 320 300 306 301 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 287
Write 254
Mixed 246
SusWrite 302
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 27.8
98% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 45.8
DQ Mixed 27.7
22% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
86GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 153 171 163 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 162
Mixed 39
SusWrite 161
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Panram PUD31600C94GPSB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A70MGP Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A70MGP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback