Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration448 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$349
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 998
94% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,859
115% 1,859 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 92.7
83% 95.6 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 79.3
74% 91.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
550GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 1753 1717 1789 1768 1748 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 1,998
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 1,754
424% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 88.3
297% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1349
DQ Write 1169
DQ Mixed 1,212
921% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 353%
Great: 425%
Intel RS3DC080 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1757 1696 1724 1709 1672 1704 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
748GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 406 404 402 385 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 470
Mixed 424
SusWrite 397
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.6
198% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 306
245% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
421GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 469 469 469 434 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 469
Mixed 425
SusWrite 456
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.8
198% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 297
240% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
744GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2342 2323 2300 2321 2321 2318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2659
Write 2,296
Mixed 1448
SusWrite 2,321
489% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 90.7
320% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,029% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 409%
Great: 425%
Hitachi TOURO S 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 80
Write 85.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 89.4
50% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 75%
AFT MSD XM37U SS 125GB
112GB free, PID 6558
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.8 13 15 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 13
27% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
80% 2.33 MB/s
AFT SD XM37U SS 250GB
226GB free, PID 6558
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 15 16 14 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 15
Mixed 17
SusWrite 13.7
24% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
36% 2.4 MB/s
AFT CF XM37U SS 64GB
50GB free, PID 6558
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 122 123 124 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
Read 147
Write 125
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 123
163% 123 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.7
185% 4.67 MB/s
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
73GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 46 45 46 45 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 58.8
MC Mixed 34.5
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 12.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback