| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180221 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 18 '20 at 11:49 |
| Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
88% 160 Pts
|
80% 666 Pts
|
68% 1,106 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
110%
Outstanding
|
112% 135 fps
|
113% 142 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 294 293 295 295 294 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 73 79 81 78 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 130 134 132 120 MB/s
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.6%
Good
|
66% 23.2 GB/s
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 513 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 126x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 80x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 52x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |