Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TE11BZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 15:52
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 44.9
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 30.1
22% 30.3 Pts
4-Core 34.5
8-Core 32.7
5% 33.6 Pts
64-Core 32.8
2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Acer(1025 0690) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.25 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320421AS 320GB-$90
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 63 64 74 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 63.2
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 6GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TE11BZ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback