PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | AMD 970A-D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
OS | Windows 8 |
BIOS Date | 20121018 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '17 at 21:57 |
Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3653) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT2G3D1869DT 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples | 19x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 15x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 13x |
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 3x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $407 |