Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H67H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H67H2-EM
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 12:05
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 151
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 354
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 45
Parallax 44.2
36% 44.2 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.1
30% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 500 499 496 503 502 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 104 97 105 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 108
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 151 154 147 147 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 150
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3 3 3 3 2.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.9
6% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback