| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A58ML (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140331 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 29 '20 at 12:20 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 58% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.4%
Average
|
40% 57.3 Pts
|
18% 119 Pts
|
6% 91.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 419.35
|
4.67%
Terrible
|
5% 5.2 fps
|
4% 5.13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 45 54 41 46 48 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
17% 79.2 MB/s
|
28% 8.1 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
123GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 101 91 105 101 101 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
53% 72.6 MB/s
|
112% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix MPPU4GBPC1333 N0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.7%
Poor
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
18% 6.23 GB/s
|
43% 92.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A58ML Builds (Compare 19 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A58ML
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 3x |
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 2x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 2x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 1x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $51 |