MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '20 at 20:01
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 670 63% 525 Pts	64-Core 864 54% 864 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 87.1 58% 76.2 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 57 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,323 Write 1,170 Mixed 1,253 348% 1,582 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 70.5 236% 80.9 MB/s	DQ Read 817 DQ Write 592 DQ Mixed 773 559% 727 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 158GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 106 108 111 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 177 Write 126 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 107 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 636GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 102 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 100 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 84%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 56GB free Firmware: 10.01E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 55 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 53 Write 55 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 55.1 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%
Generic- Compact Flash 2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0184 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 7 7 7 6.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.21% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 6.8 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 6.9 10% 8.03 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.21% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 32.9 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 26.3 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,394x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	689x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	285x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	282x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	274x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	123x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	122x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	367x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	156x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $482

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)