PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111110 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '20 at 03:41 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3062
|
0.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 63 41 70 77 88 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
273GB free, PID ab36
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.3 MB/s
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
226GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.3 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.3 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB
11GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
202GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
42.1%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,669x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 546x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |