Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 913
81% 685 Pts
64-Core 1322
82% 1322 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 74.2
75% 81.1 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 74
61% 74.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 484
Mixed 311
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 49
172% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 177
184% 300 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
404GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 460 465 468 428 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 464
Mixed 445
SusWrite 424
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 48.6
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 277
233% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
660GB free
Firmware: 1201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.7
Write 102
Mixed 60
65% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 104
Write 77
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 99.8
111% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback