HP HPE-370nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP HPE-370nl  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 19:39
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 147
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 320
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 8
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 141 117 116 112 114 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 250
Write 232
Mixed 233
SusWrite 135
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 30.8
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 196
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 159 150 149 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 165
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 157
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 108%
Asmedia AS2115 1.5TB
393GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 118 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 61
SusWrite 116
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-370nl Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-370nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback