Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A65
Motherboard	MSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65) (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170206
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 241 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 370 42% 326 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 75.1 Parallax 70.5 58% 72.3 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 72.4 Splatting 67.6 56% 69 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 24GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 447 Write 424 Mixed 322 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 30.8 128% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 172 164% 254 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 64 67 115 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 91.8 Write 76.8 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 81.1 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 107%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB 1,169 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 12GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 4.4 2 5.9 5.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Read 3.8 Write 2.8 Mixed 1 SusWrite 5 4% 3.15 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.7% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 21.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	73x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	44x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16