Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 05:29
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,048
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,092
130% 2,092 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 184
Parallax 176
163% 187 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 139
Splatting 126
118% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2955 3143 3066 3411 3413 1013 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 3,334
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 2,834
558% 2,450 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 56.2
198% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,164
877% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 356%
Great: 502%
Amd-raid Array 1 16TB
14.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 358 228 246 301 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 321
Write 210
Mixed 146
SusWrite 273
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.4
18% 6.03 MB/s
DQ Read 7.2
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 3.7
4% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 24.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback